If we have an earthquake today, it would be a disaster because of the density of population.
Prof Jean-Philippe Avouac, from the University of Cambridge, told BBC
News: "This is a place that needs attention, and if we had an
earthquake today, it would be a disaster because of the density of
population not just in western Nepal but also in northern India, in the
Gangetic plain."
 |
| The earthquake that hit Nepal in 2015 claimed the lives of about 9,000 people
|
The 7.8 magnitude earthquake that struck Nepal
earlier this year killed about 9,000 people, and left many thousands
more injured and homeless.
It occurred in a geological collision
zone, where the Indian tectonic plate pushes north into the Eurasian
plate, moving the ground an average of 2cm a year.
ver decades, stress built up along a stretch of the fault line, which
is called the Main Himalayan Thrust fault, close to Nepal's capital
Kathmandu.
The
boundary between the two plates in this area had become locked - stuck
together by friction, and so immobile - building up energy that only a
major earthquake could release.
"Lives would be saved by drilling school children in western Nepal and the nearby plains of northern India" : Prof David
Rothery, Open University
 |
| The earthquake triggered an avalanche on Everest - but experts say the damage could have been worse
|
However, the quake on 25 April only released part of this pent-up pressure.
"If
the earthquake had ruptured all the locked zone all the way to the
front of the Himalayas, it would have been a much larger earthquake,"
said Prof Avouac.
Instead, the researchers believe that some of
this stress has shifted west, to an area stretching from the west of
Pokhara in Nepal to the north of Delhi in India.
A major
earthquake there is already long overdue: the last happened in 1505 and
is estimated to have exceeded M8.5. The researchers say the new stress
that has moved there could already be adding to the tension that has
been building up over five centuries.
"At the moment, we are quite worried about western Nepal," said Prof Avouac.
The team says extra monitoring by the research community is now
needed, although it is impossible to predict accurately when the natural
disaster might strike.
"We don't want to scare people, but it is
important they are aware that they are living in a place where there is a
lot of energy available," Prof Avouac explained.
"A lot of
families are building their own houses in Nepal. With minimum care, it
is possible to build small buildings that can withstand large
earthquakes."
Commenting on the research, Prof David Rothery from Open University
said: "Monitoring techniques have now advanced to the stage where we can
work out how a previously 'locked' fault has 'unzipped' during the
couple of minutes that it takes a major earthquake to happen.
"Lives
would be saved by drilling school children in western Nepal and the
nearby plains of northern India in how to react in the event of an
earthquake, and in ensuring that at least school buildings are
adequately constructed to survive seismic shaking."
 |
| The Indian Plate is moving north into the Eurasian Plate
|
Data from
advanced GPS stations has also revealed that the death toll could have
been far higher. These stations track tiny shifts in ground position, at
a rate of five measurements every second.
Scientists say the
seismic waves travelling underground were a lower frequency than
expected, causing the ground to vibrate more gently.
Prof Avouac said: "When I heard about this M7.8 earthquake happening
so close to Kathmandu, I was prepared for a death toll in the order of
300,000 or 400,000 people.
"But this earthquake didn't generate a
lot of high frequency waves, which would have been devastating for the
small buildings in Kathmandu. They could withstand the earthquake
because of the characteristics of the 'pulse' - and its relative
smoothness."
No comments:
Post a Comment